A dilemma ran through my head as I was contemplating another article a few days ago:
- Given the lack of significant support for what I’m doing;
- Given the potential availability of support;
- Given also the potential gamut of consequences for the planet, everyone and everything on it;
- Can I therefore assume those with the resources to do so, refuse to support what they see as a threat?
- Can I therefore assume they’ll only support what they can corrupt and control?
- Should I therefore cease risking placing anymore information in their hands ..?
- … and thus just allow the workd to fail?
Perhaps it is only after the failure of everything, that if somehow we survive, then people might really listen.
Yes, you should keep publishing we need you and you know it.
Thanks … It’s just been very tough and I’m feeling the pressure and strain … I do appreciate the support and vote of confidence.